|
Title:
|
|
Een vergelijking van drie opties voor decommissioning van een kerncentrale
|
|
|
|
Author(s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published by:
|
Publication date:
|
|
ECN
NUCLEAIR
|
1997
|
|
|
|
ECN report number:
|
Document type:
|
|
ECN-C--97-016
|
ECN publication
|
|
|
|
Number of pages:
|
Full text:
|
|
56
|
Download PDF
|
Abstract:
One of the two nuclear power plants in the Netherlands will bedismantled. The following three options are compared: (1) fast and complete
dismantlement (duration 10 years); (2) postponed complete dismantlement
(duration circa 50 years); and (3) in-situ dismantlement (partial
dismantlement in combination with shielding, isolation and coverage of the
pressure vessel and biological shield). All three options must result in a
so-called 'green meadow', where nothing (except option 3) reminds of the
reactor and which area can be used for every activity. A large number of the
final conditions show no preference for one of the options. Most of the final
conditions by means of which the options can be distinguished concern
medium-term and long-term uncertainties (e.g. costs and future standards with
respect to radiological consequences of the release of radioactive waste
materials). The uncertainties are the lowest in case of option 1. 4 figs., 8
tabs., 3 appendices
Back to List