Publications

Skip Navigation Links.
Recently Published
Expand per documenttypeper documenttype
Collapse per Unitper Unit
Expand Business DevelopmentBusiness Development
Expand Biomass & Energy EfficiencyBiomass & Energy Efficiency
Expand Policy StudiesPolicy Studies
Expand Corporate CommunicationsCorporate Communications
Expand CorporateCorporate
Expand Environment & Energy EngineeringEnvironment & Energy Engineering
Expand Program DevelopmentProgram Development
Expand Quality Safety Health and EnvironmentQuality Safety Health and Environment
Expand Strategy & PlanningStrategy & Planning
Expand Wind EnergyWind Energy
Collapse Solar EnergySolar Energy
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
Expand per Clusterper Cluster

Search for publications:


Limit search to the fields

ECN publication
Title:
Bifacial Module Testing
 
Author(s):
Newman, B.K.; Carr, A.J.; Groot, K.M. de; Dekker, N.J.J.; Aken, B.B. van; Vlooswijk, A.H.G.; Loo, B. van de
 
Published by: Publication date:
ECN Solar Energy 25-9-2017
 
ECN report number: Document type:
ECN-M--17-030 Conference Paper
 
Number of pages: Full text:
4 Download PDF  

Presented at: EUPVSEC, Amsterdam, , 25-29 september 2017.

Abstract:
Bifacial modules, capable of additional power generation from the rear side, are a promising technology for increased energy yield compared to standard PV (monofacial) modules and with a low added cost. In order to provide customers and end-users confidence in the bifacial products now available on the market a clear laboratory test is needed that is both accurate and feasible with the current characterization equipment. A draft bifacial standard test has been proposed and suggests options for both full laboratory testing and characterization for modules from a manufacturing line. The authors conducted a survey of various parties in the PV value chain including institutes, module manufacturers, and equipment suppliers, gathering more information about the advantages and disadvantages of different test protocols and to use as a guide for recommendation for best practices after future laboratory evaluation.


Back to List